The chart shows the annual GDP growth rates in 3 countries from 2007 to 2010.
The column chart illustrates the yearly rate of GDP growth in three selected countries over a period of 3 years, starting from 2007.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the proportion of GDP growth in Japan, while the opposite was true of the figures for Tunisia and Ecuador.
In 2007, the percentage of Tunisia stood at over 6% in comparison with that of Japan, at only two percent. However, Japanese yearly rate of growth doubled in the next year, whereas the Tunisia’s GDP growth declined to just over 4%. At the end of the period, the figure for Japan reached a peak at approximately 6%, which was twice as much as that of Tunisia, at 3%.
Starting at roughly during the first year of the period, the percentage of GDP growth in Ecuador rose to 4% in 2008, followed by a significant decrease to just over 1% one year later. This figure soon recovered in 2010, at about 2%, which was the lowest among three countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- With divorce rates and family breakdowns increasing globally, it is generally accepted thatfamilies today are not as close as they used to be.Discuss the causes of this problem and offer dome possible solutions to it. 84
- The pie chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 69
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree? 73
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- the pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year2010. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59281437126 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52581068228 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580838323353 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7993298728 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.571428571 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220484616609 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114302186694 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122640645693 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16487918853 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130908558253 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.