The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and
international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010.
The line graph illustrates average yearly expenditure of consumers on three selected types of services, namely cell phone, national and international fixed line services over a period of 9 years, starting from 2001.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the expenditure on mobile phone, while the opposite was true for that of national fixed line services during the period. It is also noticeable that the amount of money spent on international fixed line remain stable over the period shown.
In 2001, roughly $700 was spent on national fixed line services, in comparison with the figure for mobile phone services, at about $200. In the next five years, the expense of cell phone increased to approximately $500, whereas the expenditure on national fixed line experienced a fall of $200 to $500. At the end of the period, the amount of money for cell phone reached a peak at around $750. Meanwhile, only $400 was spent on national fixed line in 2010.
Starting at roughly $250 during the first year of the period, the expenditure on international fixed line services fluctuated at around $300 three years later. For the rest of the period, its figure remained unchanged, at about $300, which was the lowest among three types of services.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-22 | jAnP | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-16 | doremonvip123 | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-16 | doremonvip123 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree? 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year2010. 61
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 89
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88942307692 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66059186563 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471153846154 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3183117122 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277532487281 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141290640179 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988099623775 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206250513906 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107047239939 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.