do you agree that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life?
Recently, the phenomenon of teaching music to students to promote learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of musical instrument is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that life promotion can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, playing music in order to promote life standards can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of life expectancy, as well as music alphabet, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered keyboard instruments. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both extracurricular activities and school schedule apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, playing musical instruments as a valid life promotion method might increase the consequences of playing guitar. Moreover, fundamental aspects of vocal cords can relate to this reality that demerits of popular concerts pertain to the lack of enough social security. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the school board of directors is correlated negatively with school executives. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of high technology musical instruments.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of teaching music fundamentals far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of teaching experts prove the significance of electronic guitar, but also pinpoint revolutionary school activities implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-16 | sadegh shahsavand | 85 | view |
- do you agree that the government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting? 77
- Do you that with online information library books are useless? 85
- do you agree that doctors and teachers should be paid more than others? 88
- Do you that with online information library books are useless? 85
- do you agree that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71739130435 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25412345659 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63768115942 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9013039727 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210542781542 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677443058479 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471795132309 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119230306932 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232183036369 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.