Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Placing advertisements in schools have been the epicenter of discussion in multiple forums and a conclusive unanimous agreement is yet to be achieved. Different distinguished individuals have expressed their views both in favor and against the very idea of placing advertisements for funding in schools through multiple modes of communication be it a main stream media or be it the social media. Below in essay of mine I will try to enunciate that for funding advertisements is not a good option.
The most prominent reason is that if schools will put holdings in their walls than those holdings will attract the students. Moreover, this can lead them not to focus in the lecture which can lead to a big problem during their exams. In addition, they might ask teachers all the time about the advertisements. For example, what is this add, what we can do with this product and how to use it and so on.
Continuing to this, advertisement can lead them to ignore the physical activities as while playing outside they might start looking at the holdings and stop doing their physical activity. Furthermore, they might force their parents to buy those products which have been hanging in the school. However, parents can convince them not to buy as it is not necessary to buy all the items which have been put up in school.
While on the other hand, there are people who will still continue to wrangling about the facts of advertisements. I would like to conclude that schools should not depend on the advertisements for funding. Schools can arrange the funds by other resources like role play, exhibitions and stage performances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | kbalavenka | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | a.aghyi1989 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | neethujithin | 55 | view |
- Some people believe that the use of mobile phones in public is as annoying as smoking and should be banned similarly to smoking Give your opinion and examples from your own experience 61
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most agr 72
- It is better for boys and girls to study separately rather than study in mixed sex classes. They are less distracted and this leads to better results.Do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exampl 65
- Some people think that Parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these view and give your opinion 58
- When travelling back home on the train last week you lost your wallet The wallet contains some valuable things In your letter write to the Station Manager say when and where you left your wallet describe the wallet and what was in it say how you will coll 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93115942029 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88238927401 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.337596746 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.692307692 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196069450551 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742375582389 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471670254893 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123972377904 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463624725725 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.