The line graph shows the population size,birth rate and death rate of england and wales from 1700 to 2000.
The line graph illustrates the information about the population size of the England and Wales in millions. The birth and death rate (per 1000 of people) of the England and Wales between 1700 and 2000.
A brisk look on the graph makes it clear that, over the period of given years, the population size rose significantly instead of birth and death rate.
A close look on line graph makes it lucid that, in 1700, the population size stood at nearly 3 millions. After 5 decades (1750), it uplifted rapidly to 10 millions which was levelled off till 1800. From 1800 to 2000, it soared steeply to approximately 50 millions and reached on apex point. Whereas, in the initial year (1700), the death rate stayed at about 27 per 1000 of individuals. In 1750, it was increased sharply to just over 35 which was stable till 1800. Between 1800 and 1950, it went down quickly to 20 which remained stagnant till 2000.
Despite, the birth rate of England and Wales stood at 30 in 1700. It climbed steeply to 40 in 1750 and remained constant till 1800. From 1800 to 1950 it went down quickly to below 25. After 50 years ( in 2000), it grew markedly to over 30.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Lovepreet123 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | Lovepreet123 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | hunanmail | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | Hardik006 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | namra | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that robots are important for the future human development. While others say that they are dangerous and put negative impact on society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The graph shows the differences in wheat exports over 3 different areas. 67
- The graph given shows the main sources of energy for USA in 1980 and 1990 36
- The line graph shows the population size,birth rate and death rate of england and wales from 1700 to 2000. 49
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...down quickly to below 25. After 50 years in 2000, it grew markedly to over 30. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52403846154 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31364916274 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495192307692 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1553751594 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.3846153846 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.61538461538 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421447064292 0.215688989381 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150297427751 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145169793556 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310129768601 0.15604864568 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157045520155 0.0819641961636 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.