Wone with the Wind
The film Gone with the Wind has caused a lot of controversy, as portraited in the reading, because of allegations of racism. Nevertheless, it opened the doors of Hollywood for new generations of african american actors to come.
The lecturer explains how the film does not intent to be racist and that this statements are overstated. The film is set to explain how life was lived before the Civil War, in order to introduce the idea of American social conditions being better afterwards, not only with the abolition of slaves but also with womans rights.
One of the main characters is Prissy, which was represented by Butterfly McQueen. He delivered an outstanding performance, being rebellious and hysterical. He was discontent from obeing, which is clearly shown on the film.
Also, altought Mammy is not given a name in the script, this character was very complex and rich. It portraits an african as being passionate and protective of their love ones. The actress won in fact the first academy award for an african american for its performance.
In conclusion, viewers should appreciate what the film represents and how it helped new sets of black actors to come.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-07-27 | Maliet mardy | 3 | view |
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 83
- When schools do not have enough funding or teachers, some people think physical education classes should be cut, while others believe that courses in art and music should be eliminated first. Which do you think is preferable, and why? 76
- Globalization 76
- Gun Trafficking 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for people to move out of their hometowns when they become adults, instead of staying in their home communities for their whole lives. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...m does not intent to be racist and that this statements are overstated. The film is ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 196.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02551020408 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83237717736 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637755102041 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2525087766 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5454545455 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0929051450605 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030735994203 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680900680974 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0492785061982 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630651142826 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.