how do this idea in listening passage cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage?
In this set of materials, the reading part discusses the theory was suggested by winslow taylor. It is written that time-and-motion, which is one of the most important problems in factories, he claimed that if factories had used her theory, they could have improved their workers ability, and listening section cast doubt on the information presented in the passage and argue that the theory illustrated in reading part has a negative influence on both workers and products.
First, the passage posits that factory should recognize time-wasting workers. They should calculate the time and movement of factory workers in order to improve the ability of factory. However, the lecture makes the point that, if factory evaluated movement of workers, they would be resisted and has a negative influence on workers.
The second according to the text, managers should use time-and-motion studies in their management. One the important part of the proposal is that they should distinguish lower workers because they evaluate how much they move. The speaker disagrees with this point, and, asserts that workers in the factory aren’t robots. They can’t work like a machine so they shouldn’t work like machines.
Third, the article claims that the tasks of higher-skilled workers are spread among lower-skilled workers in order to improve the operation of lower-skilled workers and factory can pay the lower cost to higher-skilled-workers. The lecture points out that if the factory gave a small task to higher-skilled-workers, they would not enjoy their tasks.
In conclusion, the talk bolsters, the mentioned piece of information in the passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-29 | salarmoheb | 66 | view |
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 88
- tpo49 3
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? famous entertainers and athletics deserve to have more privacy than they have now.use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 76
- how do this idea in listening passage cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage? 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed piece of information in the passage.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 257.0 407.700716846 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46303501946 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26535889283 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556420233463 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.4169615768 48.9658058833 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0853812181972 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329039971801 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474741476938 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047150555917 0.150856017488 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626788234777 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.