Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the current time of technology, advancement one of the most pressing concern is regarding given topic doing work in which firm; same or different is good for life? I shall explore the dimensions of this topic through examples and shape up my opinion by the end.
On one side, some people agree with doing work in same field in whole life because a pleathora of pros about this. A person can enhance their physical and mental abilty, and create good image in working area with the help of co-operation. As well as people get good ideas from another and ultimately regarding these scenario the knowldge abilty of people should be enhance day by day.
Contrary to this, there is few masses favourable
for working in distinct institutions because they believe it is great way of elegant life. A people earn more money from different working fields as for as they enhance thier social relation, and learning marvellous skills to another experience person. During these working style the individual identity extensively renowed in the era. A good illustration of this, according to World Economic Forum Uma Lele ranked top 3 in 2017 country ranking in multiferous work profile.
Nevertheless, weighing both the opinions, i believe that there is no single conclusion. Still, i take this ground a satisfied work profile is better than succesfull working life because success is measured by others but satisfiaction is measured by our own sould, mind and heart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-29 | kaur randhawa | 85 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990. 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010. 67
- some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means. while others believe that these games are contributing to children development. 89
- percentags of food budget spent on resturant meals home cookingliner chart shows fast food vs sitdown resturant 61
- The graph shows the demand for electercity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this scenario' or 'these scenarios'?
Suggestion: this scenario; these scenarios
...s from another and ultimately regarding these scenario the knowldge abilty of people should be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enhanced'?
Suggestion: enhanced
...the knowldge abilty of people should be enhance day by day. Contrary to this, there...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are few masses'?
Suggestion: there are few masses
...hance day by day. Contrary to this, there is few masses favourable for working in distinct i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to this, there is few masses favourable for working in distinct institutions bec...
^^^^
Line 6, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more money from different working fields as for as they enhance thier social rela...
^^
Line 8, column 43, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...vertheless, weighing both the opinions, i believe that there is no single conclus...
^
Line 8, column 96, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...t there is no single conclusion. Still, i take this ground a satisfied work profi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03703703704 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67506172333 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650205761317 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0051335852 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.272727273 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344755677957 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116594382204 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660468088475 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157048341145 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833648627888 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.