It is more important to read and watch news presented by people whose opinion is different from your own view than by people whose opinion are similar to yours.
In the occasion of a protest, one reporter chooses to write down the negative that people fight fiercely while the other choses to take the photo that one young person was helping an elder. Different people see different side toward the same thing. Therefore, I am of the opinion that people should read and watch news presented by people whose opinion is different from ours.
To begin with, news presented by a different opinion could help us to realize the issue comprehensively. In other words, sometimes we choose to see things in the angle that we are comfortable to and that could be dangerous because it is only our partial opinion. For example, I had been though that the government should completely eliminate the usage of nuclear power in our country. I did not chang my mind until the news that our Country, Taiwan, is actually facing a severe shortage of energy. Without the nuclear power, people in our country would have to stop using air-condition during the summer that average temperature is 35 Celsius. By knowing this, I realize that the nuclear power is necessary for living.
Furthermore, we could be more sympatheic with others if we read and watch news presented by people whose opinion is different from ours. That is to say, we have to accept different ideas or concepts no matter we identify them. Tyring to listen to politicians who we are not agree with would examplify my second reason perfectly. Even though I disagree with out current president of Taiwan, Ying-Wen, Tsai, I sometimes watch the program that she was invited to give a talk about important issue such as marrige equalibrium. I hold the idea that everyone sould obtain equal right no matter their gender preference while she finds that questionable. I listen to what she said about her opinion and think about it thoroughly. Finally I could try to step on her side, understanding the potential problem she expresses.
People were born to be different. The most important thing that we should care about is not to let others listen to our feeling and opinion but try hard to understand others’ different ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... whose opinion is different from ours. To begin with, news presented by a diffe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...to listen to politicians who we are not agree with would examplify my second reason p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...eason perfectly. Even though I disagree with out current president of Taiwan, Ying-Wen, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 723, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... opinion and think about it thoroughly. Finally I could try to step on her side, unders...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, in other words, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89166666667 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64847819104 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547222222222 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.170911805 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8333333333 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301245129434 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990795808041 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148912775177 0.0737576698707 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198549143368 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107226888013 0.0645574589148 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.