Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of experimental learning can work well in formal education and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that formal education with experimental learning can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, well effects of experimental learning in formal education can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, formal education by experimental learning can work well might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of working well in formal education by experimental learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against old 88
- Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to kip fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behavior. If sporting events can lea 88
- Laws can change human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71861471861 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22864793112 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61038961039 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0926297696 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.1 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324082640605 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130461798276 0.0925447433944 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127795029849 0.071462118173 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205595000767 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389295713351 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.