Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.

Essay topics:

Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.

Government provide all types of facilities and jobs for their nation. Nevertheless, statement reveals the information about shoul government spend money on railways rather than roads. However, I disagree adout 70/30 ratio and explore all the dimensions in the upcoming paragraphs.

First and foremost, why government make roads for us here there are some issues. Firstly, by the roads we can easily move one city to other with our own private vehicles. Moreover, any time we can drive vehicle on roads. Secondly, it gives us freedom, we can stop vehicles to click some photographs,enjoy weather with family members and friends. however, enjoy party with friends. In addition to this, we can enjoy alot beauty of destination. Furthermore, third one is more imprtant point, Nowadays people like to buy things online so, roads are best source of home to home delivery by delivery person. Whereas, other methods is not correct for delivery. For example by airplane or railways.

Moving further, I illustrate why government spend more money on railways. There are only one sufficient point regarding to this. When masses go for long distance area they only choose railways because it is faster than private vehicles and they feel more comfortable and relax. In addition to this, people had no attension regarding to care of driving they only enjoy with their friends and family members. The survey conducted by trnsportation department of India, they said in their report adout 30 percentages people like to long term journey by railways because they feel much secure while travelling.

In the conclusion, roads are better than railways whereas, many types of facilities we enjoy while travelling on roads.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-06 Thanh Phong B2407053 56 view
2024-11-06 Tấn Quý 30 view
2024-11-06 Thanh Phong B2407053 56 view
2024-11-06 Ngô Quốc Thắng 56 view
2024-11-06 Nguyen Thinh 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
Government provide all types of facilities and jobs for th...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
Government provide all types of facilities and jobs for th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , enjoy
... stop vehicles to click some photographs,enjoy weather with family members and friends...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...eather with family members and friends. however, enjoy party with friends. In addition ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s are better than railways whereas, many types of facilities we enjoy while trave...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, whereas, while, for example, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24452554745 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71381963024 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583941605839 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6358378961 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8333333333 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2222222222 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214665275458 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682433169609 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129277989658 0.0667982634062 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163260872944 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111014507699 0.056905535591 195% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.