The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010.
The given table illustrates how much money US, charity organizations in EU and other nations support technology of developing nations financially in the period of 4 years between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, financial support from the charities on this purpose experienced a growth whereas the US made the most contribution to help develop technology in underdeveloped nations.
As can be seen from the given table, the US was the biggest contributor, with 9.7 billion dollars in 2006, which followed by the figures for EU nations and other nations with 3.3 and 2.7 billion dollars. Meanwhile, the total money of the world was spent on this action, with 15.7 billion dollars.
Over the next two years, there was a steady increase in the figures for EU nations and other nations, reaching a new high of 3.8 and 3.1 billion dollars respectively. From 2008 onward, the figures for other nations decreased by 0.2% before seeing a significant turnaround to 3.3 billion dollars in 2010 whereas there was an increase of 0.2% in the figure for EU countries.
Over the given period of 4 years, the US witnessed a dramatic increase to 22.7 billion dollars in 2010, which tripled the total amount of money spent by two other categories surveyed. Finally, in 2010, the total money of nations worldwide doubled its figures in 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-01 | Thang Tran | 89 | view |
- Water resources around the world are falling deficient Analyze the possible reasons and provide your suggestions 93
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 63
- Environmental problems are serious many countries It means that the only possible way to protect the environment is at an international level To what extent do you agree or disagree on this hypothesis 98
- It is said that the fast pace of our everyday life as a direct result of the rapid development of telecommunications technology and travel industry has negative effects on individuals nations and the globe To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- Some people think that radio has been out of date and there is no need to listen to the radio for entertainment and news Do you agree or disagree 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02262443439 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70744064453 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506787330317 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.1924703352 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.75 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289978461445 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141793896841 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907339725999 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185496696415 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090593133576 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.