Some people think the modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It has recently been argued that whether new technology has affected people’s interpersonal skills positively or negatively. Many people claim that the state-of-the-art technology-the Internet in particular- has made individuals of greater communication skills whereas others take a dim view of such an idea. While I agree that it seems people could have been making more friends through using the Internet at a first glance, they have becoming more and more alone in reality.
Technology has provided any so-called internet users with the chance of making different people’s acquaintance. Firstly, they could forge a substantial number of relationships with people from every corner of the globe. Needless to say, hardly could anyone have been in touch with people from faraway places if they had not have access to the Internet. Secondly, many youngsters have been sharing their emotions in the virtual world which in-turn makes them feel talking to a friend. Finally, there are many individuals who rely on people as their close confidants although they might have never met them in person nor will meet in the future.
However, the growth in the rate of depression specially among juveniles would be a symptom of their disordered sort of communications. Many people lock themselves up in their rooms sitting back at their laptops and chatting with strangers nowadays. They think they are surrounded with many friends but the simple truth is they feel alienated in their schools, offices and even their homes. They mainly get used to put a distance between themselves and their families or friends. To be more exact, opening your heart to your mother seems to become impossible today, let alone to your friends. The facts mentioned above lead me to believe technology has actually afflicted people concerning communication skills.
In essence, even though social media, the Internet and technology at large have apparently increased the number of humans’ friends, they have actually deteriorated people's social abilities. I would reaffirm my position that technology has done more harm than good to humanity with regard to their social skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-28 | workpeterwang@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | workpeterwang@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | workpeterwang@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | workpeterwang@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | workpeterwang@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The local council is about to destroy children playground in your area because it is under use Write a letter and tell them The importance of this playground Why it is not well used What can be done so more people can use it 92
- Write a letter complaining about the dirty roads and garbage in your street What the problems would be What are the main causes Your suggestions 96
- Many people think that having more money will make them happier How important is money to happiness 81
- In the world of internet, people write on internet about a product’s reviews and opinions about a service . Is it a good thing or bad thing? 84
- Some people think the modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ple from faraway places if they had not have access to the Internet. Secondly, many ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owth in the rate of depression specially among juveniles would be a symptom of th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in particular, sort of, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3724340176 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84782895762 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592375366569 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.744368798 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200550204239 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685634376935 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426814652513 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126794419862 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510997537282 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.