Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious
pollution and uses up the world’s fuel resources.
After an extended period of using, air travel outweighs other vehicles to become the most optimizing transportation method. However, a proportion stated that because of a large amount of air pollution and an enormous consumption of energy resources, travelling via airline should be limited. Personally, a partial agreement is my point of views. In this essay, information and evidence are given to clarify my point of views.
On the one hand, scientists proved that burning fuels released an immense CO2 emission, causing the Greenhouse effect and Global warming. Based on the collected data, air travel discharges the most significant proportion of CO2 emissions into the environment when operating. In detail, it released 560 grams CO2 emissions for one ton of transported goods by airplane, far exceeding the number of 47 grams per ton of carrying by truck. Additionally, the percentage of fuel consumption of travelling by planes accounts for 12% of the total amount, which means the resources are intensively used to conduct this method of transportation.
On the other hand, the demand for travelling keeps growing over the time. It is clear that the efficacy of air travel is significantly higher than that of other types of transportation. Due to statistics, planes out-performed travelling by two type of Toyota cars. For example, the index of seats mile per gallon of fuel of Delta airline is 60.4 mpg compared to 18 mpg of Chevy Suburban car and 50 mpg of Toyota Prius. Consequently, restricting air travel leads to the probability of discharging more CO2 emissions and wasting energy resources. Moreover, the old adage that flying is the safest way to travel still holds true today – the recent track record of the airline industry not withstanding. The chance of you boarding a flight that will be in a fatal accident is one in seven million. That translates to meaning that even if you flew every day of your life, you would have to fly for nineteen thousand years before you would experience a fatal crash
To conclude, I believe that the improvement in airplane technologies which can reduce the CO2 emissions or the innovation about new Eco-friendly sources can help our environment performs a grander scale of positive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-19 | mimeomahong | 84 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Topic: Fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy (wind energy and solar energy) are encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative dev 89
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes seriouspollution and uses up the world’s fuel resources. 84
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops. 89
- Some cities have few control over design and construction on housing and office buildings People think that they are free to choose the design they like Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 96
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, moreover, so, still, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10326086957 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.987089224 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589673913043 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.429786829 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.375 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188958195737 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579200050009 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543765409753 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967722121528 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044838152389 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.