Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of saying that music is as important as other subjects to promote learning in kids' life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of kids' talents is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that some musical instruments can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning music as an important activity by kids can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that student-oriented class, as well as the diverse styles of music, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the increasing proportion of guilty children. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both music learning and leisure time apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, learning music by children might increase the consequences of their talents. Moreover, fundamental aspects of parents' responsibilities can relate to this reality that the demerits of the duty of the pedagogical system pertain to a schematized activity by an instructor. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a lot of genius pupils is correlated negatively with the proper schedules. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the jazz music.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides. I profoundly believe that the benefits of the importance of learning music far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of pop music prove the significance of some bad-tempered toddlers, but also pinpoint the implications of several high-quality methods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Ahmed Abuelmagd | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her subjects to promote learning in kids life and its corresponding impact has sp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46598639456 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2627842444 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615646258503 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8590847465 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.615384615 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24176721915 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775347541101 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07813215045 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135817704774 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408367413517 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.