the tables below
The provided chart demonstrates some data as regards metro lines in London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles.
Regarding to the relatively ancient lines, London underground is considered as the oldest one because it was firstly operated in 1863 in comparison to Paris and Tokyo’s lines which were opened in 1900 and 1927 respectively. Moreover, London, Paris and Tokyo lines carry about 775 million, 1191 million, and 1972 million commuters annually. As a matter of lines’ length, London railways are considered the longest network among other cities.
Moving on to modern railways, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles undergrounds’ first journeys were in 1976, 1981 and 2001 in the same order. Whilst Washington DC’s one is 126 KM long and serves 144 million passengers a year, Los Angeles’s railway is 28 km and transport 50 million persons per year. By looking at Kyoto, its underground system is the shortest among others, hence it serves only 45 million.
Overall, old lines such as London, Paris and Tokyo serve the highest number of passengers, in contrast to modern ones which are considerably shorter and serve significantly less numbers.
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railways lines for very fast trains between cities, Others believe the money should be spent on improving public transport,Discuss both of these v 84
- the maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large some of money on constructing new railways lines for very fast trains between cities, Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.discuss both t 73
- the tables below 11
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun numbers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...derably shorter and serve significantly less numbers.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, as regards, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3670212766 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94922226207 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664893617021 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8470852693 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.125 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.25 5.23603664747 253% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.