The charts illustrate how recycling is carried out in Eutopia, and the pie charts show the percentage of recycled and unrecycled waste
The bar chart indicates some the ways of recycling in Eutopia and the pie charts depict the proportion of recycled and unrecycled waste over three separate years. Overall, it is apparent that the percentage of collecting from recycling bins at home was the highest and the proportion of unrecycled waste considerably decreased throughout 20 years.
It can be seen from the chart that collecting from recycled bins at home occupied at the highest percentage, but this figure decreased from 78 percent in 1980 to 72 percent in 2000. By contrast, recycling at stations and other recycling did not have significant changes, at 18 percent and 2 percent respectively in 2000. The percentage of waste returned to producers fell by 2 percent in 1990 and grow by 3 percent in 2000.
In 1980, the proportion of unrecycled waste created just over 90 percent but this figure decreased to 78 percent in 1990 and declined by 11 percent in 2000. On the other hand, the percentage of recycled garbage in each year increased by the figure for unrecycled garbage reduced
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The line graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007 in grams 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technogy affected the types of relationships that people make?Has this been a positive or negative development? 56
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? 61
- The chart shows the percentage of power generated from 6 different types in Gareline 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...derably decreased throughout 20 years. It can be seen from the chart that colle...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 1990 and grow by 3 percent in 2000. In 1980, the proportion of unrecycled wa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97191011236 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81586237663 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477528089888 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2358868485 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.428571429 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280571887785 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152666002619 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120929778454 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218654038145 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124239783979 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.