As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Since the advent of technology, it has made huge impact on human life. The way people use their thought process and decision making capabilities has significantly changed compared to ancient time. Where in many cases technology has helped human being in reducing their effort, current generation is not able to process efficiently as ancient people. This is because people have seen that technical stuff is performing their work efficiently and rapidly. Therefore, people have started relying upon technology for decision making & solving common problems.
With the advent of Artificial intelligence, people are mostly relying upon software for optimal decision making that has consequently reduced their brainstorming power. In the earlier times, men travelling from one point to another used to think by mind that what will be the shortest and best possible path to go through. Undoubtedly, this is very helpful to keep one's brain active for processing and such processing leads to proper grooming of brain and thought power. However, now-a-days men have been totally dependent upon software--for example Google Maps--for processing of shortest path from one point to another. In such case, no thought power is involved from men's own intellect and thus leading to reduction of brainstorming power.
Keeping in view the impact of technology on humans, it can be observed that human mind has now started to rely upon automated tools for their daily life activities. Let’s take an example of Alarms. How people in the earlier times used to know that they have to wake up at-Say 08- O clock in the morning? It is not the case that ancient people had no timing for anything but they also used to go for their respective works at their respective times. It was their mind set that helped them to wake up at routine time and go for their missions. On the other hand, majority of the people rely on Alarms for waking them up.
Coming toward the side of solving common problems-simple mathematical calculations-People prefer to use calculators instead of mind. However this results in increased wastage of time for very basic calculations-multiplication of two 2 digit numbers. For such basic operations, people take out calculators from their pockets, turn it on, input those 2 digit numbers, get the answer and eventually keep it back into their pockets. Such people can obviously not perform well in complex calculations by mind. Therefore, in order to grow thought power, man should first be good at basic calculations by mind.
On the other side, it can be observed that technology has also proved to be useful in factors like saving time and reducing human stress. The automation that technology provides in some areas for example: Getting maximum/minimum or average from the data, inventory management at super stores and their accounting etc. results in significant reduction of stress on human mind that could have been resulted if both of the mentioned jobs are performed manually. This also follows the reduction in time required to perform complex calculations.
So, the impact of technology on human has made its significant impact. On one side where it has advantages of reducing human stress and saving time on common problems, it too unfortunately has resulted in reducing their brainstorming power.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni
- Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Teachers should encourage their students to question everything. 70
- Reading:In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organizationstarted issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conservingresources and recycling materials. Companies that 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt onspecific points made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...doubtedly, this is very helpful to keep ones brain active for processing and such pr...
^^^^
Line 2, column 578, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the shortest'.
Suggestion: of the shortest
...for example Google Maps--for processing of shortest path from one point to another. In such...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...fer to use calculators instead of mind. However this results in increased wastage of ti...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, for example, in fact, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2783.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 537.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18249534451 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97411535462 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497206703911 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 864.9 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5779026215 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.074074074 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96296296296 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11809248403 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391320438786 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342212733779 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694641355929 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214932873119 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.