The graphs below ashow information about the weekly work hours in Australia in 2001.
The three pie charts provides data regarding the classification of employees and owner/manager depending on working hours, such as full-time (works 35-40 hours per week), part-time (works 35 hours weekly) and, long hours (over 41 hours in a week) and the total workforce in Austalia in 2001.
In general, there are a lot of workers in Australia who works long hours and a huge number of owner/manager contributes to this while the figure for regular employee accounts more to the total number of part-timers.
To start with, it can be noted that there are 6.9 million employees in Australia. Most of these workers are part-timers, followed by long hours and lastly, by full-timers (38%, 33% and, 29% respectively). Meanwhile, the figure of owner/manager in Australia was outnumbered by the employees which is at 1.9 million only. When it comes to its categories, a considerable number of owner/manager are working long hours at 67%, next to that are full-times at 19% and finally, part-times at 14%.
Combining the data of the employees and owners/managers, there are a total of 8.8 million workforce. 40% ofits total are mostly long hours (40%), then part-timers (33%) and lastly, full-timers(27%).
- The graphs below show the annual expenditure of university students in three countries in 2003 33
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?. 73
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce garden fertilizer compost 67
- The flow chart below shows the three stages of glass bottle recycling. 67
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'totals'?
Suggestion: totals
...loyees and owners/managers, there are a total of 8.8 million workforce. 40% ofits tot...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, lastly, regarding, then, while, in general, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12820512821 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1721006009 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7746911262 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195080247815 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793854400816 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799355717927 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126880116836 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917662721238 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.