Some employers want to be able to contact their stuff any time, even on holidays.
Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages?
As the present day is the age of the competitive world, the majority of company owners and top managers like to obtain a permanent communication among their stuff especially key persons and decision makers, despite the fact that the employee paid only for a specific time. From my perspective, this approach has a plethora of merits nowhere comparable with drawbacks. While the possibility to contact staff after work hours can bring evident benefits to the company, it can also bring undeniable withdrawal.
First and foremost, the mere act of communications in such a growing organization among the whole teamwork could save life’s or avoid heavy losses. To illustrate, any medical organizations without an effective emergency communications system cannot gain success, where one call could definitely save a human life in a serious medical issue. In terms of business prospect, employees should be available for 24 hours/ day for the company sake because they have the ability to perform a bargain or cancel. Consequently, communications among the company workers are working for the company sake.
However, every coin has two sides And despite all merits of such development, there are some drawbacks too Firstly, despite being on holiday, employees will have the feeling of being haunted by the employer; consequently, they may develop negativity against their boss. Secondly, people take off time to get themselves relieved from day to day stress; however, constant calling to them may work against it. To exemplify, people go on vacation alone or with family to have fun or to tear down the burden from their mind; thus contacting incessantly to them may spoil their trip.
To conclude, in my opinion, both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I tend to believe that employees should be left alone after office hours so that they can relax and enjoy their time alone or with their family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-21 | Bhupesh | 100 | view |
| 2018-09-06 | Mohamedyousef777 | 89 | view |
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 78
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 95
- Discipline is an ever increasing problem in modern schools. Some people think that discipline should be the responsibilities of teachers, while others think this is the role of parents. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
- Some employers want to be able to contact their stuff any time, even on holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communications'' or 'communication's'?
Suggestion: communications'; communication's
...izations without an effective emergency communications system cannot gain success, where one c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20322580645 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81276449791 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625806451613 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8871621044 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.416666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158909634922 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529759012643 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403376508878 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945873958611 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413836434937 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.