Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clean up the pollution that they produce, not the government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Experts throughout the developing and developed world have debated whether the cost of anti-pollution measures should be paid by individual and business sectors or the government. This essay will assert the government should play the major role in this topic.
To begin with, corporations and individuals have the responsibility to get rid of the pollutants. The central reason behind this is twofold, firstly they are the major sources of the rampant pollution problem. In fact, by studying the figure from the Environmental Department, the majority of waste in our landfill originate from household and various business sectors in Hong Kong. Secondly, eliminating pollutants by charging its sources are often more efficient. For instance, instead of having an agency remove the waste at one's front door free of charge, those who paid for their waste can understand the severity of pollution to one's well-being, and this encourage them to use things responsibly.
Although there are reasons to have individuals and business sectors pay for its own waste, the difficulties cannot be neglected, in particular the differentiation of responsibility. Take packaging waste for example. The packaging material accompanied by a new iPhone is, of course, produced and assembled by the Apple company, while it must not be forgotten that the consumers drive the demands, resulting in a controversy of whether Apple or its consumers should be responsible for waste derived from the packaging. Furthermore, compared to charge the public individually, the government is deemed more sufficient and energy-efficient in waste control, because the government can lower the cost by assigning a team to eliminate waste produced by multiple parties. Therefore, it is possible to state beyond doubt that the government have an important role to play on reducing pollution.
In conclusion, government constitutes the most suitable role in reducing pollution, despite the fact that individual and business sectors are responsible for pollution at large. It is predicted that the government will enact any measures to raise the public awareness about environmental protection in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-27 | Paramdeepsingh | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-13 | RockyGagKy | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-13 | RockyGagKy | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. 11
- The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offers students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education. Given time, technology will completely replace the traditional teacher in the classroom.Do you 89
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your locality.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community.Do you support or oppose the factory establishment?Explain your position. 73
- The table shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...understand the severity of pollution to ones well-being, and this encourage them to ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55688622754 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17146009447 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0027306172 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.571428571 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0714285714 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0824532371835 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314371236508 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318338538293 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0584576538164 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283975570404 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.