The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by 4 types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007.
The graph charts depict the amount of people , influenced by different types of noise pollution in day and night in all areas of the place where people live in 2007.
It is noticeable that both citizens and rural habitants were affected more by traffic noise. However, 64 millions of citizens experienced it in day, while 34 millions of people in rural areas had the same impact of traffic pollution in a day. Futhermore, just under 50 millions of citizens and almost 25 millions of rural habitants were bothered by noise pollution from traffic at night. In comparison with traffic, train pollution was less harmful for all people. Only 10 million people in cities and 8 million of those who lived in suburbs in day were affected by train There also were small differencies in night amount of people in both areas.
According to rest of data, aircraft and industry had no sicnificant pollution and affected less then 4 million people in day and night.
To sum up the date, it is obvious that traffic pollution was the most harmful type of noise for all habitants of the area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | ililmaidatuz | 84 | view |
- The widespread use of the Internet has thought many problems. What do you think are the main problems associated with the use of the web? What solutions can you suggest? 89
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons there relevant. 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 78
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty, and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your opinion? 76
- Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a 10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...graph charts depict the amount of people , influenced by different types of noise ...
^^
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '64 million'.
Suggestion: 64 million
...ffected more by traffic noise. However, 64 millions of citizens experienced it in day, while 3...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '34 million'.
Suggestion: 34 million
...f citizens experienced it in day, while 34 millions of people in rural areas had the same impa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 266, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '50 million'.
Suggestion: 50 million
...lution in a day. Futhermore, just under 50 millions of citizens and almost 25 millions of rura...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '25 million'.
Suggestion: 25 million
...nder 50 millions of citizens and almost 25 millions of rural habitants were bothered by noise ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 391, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...ise pollution from traffic at night. In comparison with traffic, train pollution was less ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...sicnificant pollution and affected less then 4 million people in day and night. To ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73404255319 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51273178068 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526595744681 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2732531472 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434994848033 0.215688989381 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190198880002 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094858660494 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258134044359 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941056443988 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.