The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The two pie charts provide information about the percentage of online sales of various retail sectors in Canada between 2005 and 2010.
It is clear that the proportion of online sales in different retail sectors were not equal. In addition, there had been a shift among these sectors in 2010.
In 2005, People tended to buy electronics online the most, accounted for 35%. Whereas, furniture as well as food and beverage were less common to buy online, about 25% and 22% respectively. Lastly, in the bottom of the list was video games since apparently back then programming was not able to provide people with the experience they need, so online sale for games was only 18% of all.
By 2010, thanks to the convenience provided by the internet, online shopping had become easier than before. As a result, food and beverage were on the increase to 32%, becoming the most popular online goods. Furthermore, the same trend also applied to video games which rose to 23%. However, furniture was the thing that experienced the most drastic decrease, down to 15% and for electronics, it dropped by 5%.
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Each year, the crime rate increases. What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity? 73
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, then, well, whereas, in addition, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89304812834 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52106002679 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625668449198 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3510660091 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238724367511 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964556160639 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111567362907 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181290813064 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130056184982 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.