People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
It is often said that one should never take decisions based on emotions. This has been taught to us from childhood and one constantly comes across such quotes in daily life and social media which state the same.
One might argue, what's wrong with having emotions or being emotional! True, there is nothing wrong in having emotions. After all we are the human race, being emotional is nothing but natural. But giving into them while making critical decisions can prove to be harmful at times.
Decisions based on emotions tend to be more rushed and less fruitful. Not only do emotions collude the mind and prevent it from thinking rationally but also tend to look at short-term gains ignoring long-term effects.
One might take a decision when emotional, which might seem drastic to some, and then try to justify them with logic later. But decision making is a complex process. It requires both emotions and intellect. Emotions to make it more humanitarian and intellect to vision the long-term effects and logic behind the course of action.
Those who overlook either one of the aspects are bound to make mistakes and do blunders.
No matter how much one tries to rectify them later, or defend it with logic, it just doesn't make up. For example, a wife victim of domestic violence chooses to live with the man hoping that it would stop someday. Although not justified, she tries to justify her action time and again and tries to console herself. But deep in her heart she knows that these thoughts are mere imagination she chooses to live in. Things do not change unless she takes a decision and stands up for herself.
There are numerous such examples all around us. One does not hear often that an emotional decision lead to a positive outcome. Defending them later on with logic is nothing more than making an excuse to make oneself feel better and hind from guilt.
There is no doubt that good decision is based on both emotions and intellect. Relying solely on just one might lead to poor decision eventually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- Furniture Depot employed our internet advertising company to help. Since then its sales increased by 10% over last year's totals. Furniture Depot's success demonstrates how using our internet services can increase your profitability. 63
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewer were concerned with our station’s coverage of weath 23
- The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large 58
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...which state the same. One might argue, whats wrong with having emotions or being emo...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 86, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...later, or defend it with logic, it just doesnt make up. For example, a wife victim of ...
^^^^^^
Line 12, column 62, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'hear'.
Suggestion: often hear
...ch examples all around us. One does not hear often that an emotional decision lead to a po...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, while, after all, for example, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81142857143 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29273208382 2.79657885939 82% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562857142857 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3833314192 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.5454545455 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366631484356 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110119434035 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834410990061 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171234884841 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754742580904 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 14.1392134831 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.