Television has many useful functions to play in everyone’s life, for some its relaxation, for some it is the companion. Discuss your viewpoint and support your answer with examples and discussion point
Recently, the phenomenon of beneficial functions of television in everyone’s life and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by the substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the benefits of television in people’s lives can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the role of television in relaxing individuals can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovers current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a social standpoint, the importance of television as a companion in people’s life might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the influence of television as a companion in people’s life far outweigh its drawbacks, for example, you can lie back and drink a soda while watching TV. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-02-19 | mani ambersar | 75 | view |
2019-02-19 | mani ambersar | 75 | view |
2018-09-24 | zafari_sa | 88 | view |
2018-08-14 | sara malla | 77 | view |
2018-07-11 | bashirheidari | 77 | view |
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons 88
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. 85
- Television has many useful functions to play in everyone’s life, for some its relaxation, for some it is the companion. Discuss your viewpoint and support your answer with examples and discussion point 88
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80916030534 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4481770299 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625954198473 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2974477792 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.363636364 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161936320549 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571134562966 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506497591087 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960008244315 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031459462757 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.