The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
The pie charts compare the average household expenditures in six categories in a country between 1950 and 2010. From the general perspective, different trends in the percentage of household spending could be observed, all categories had an increase, except in housing.
It is evident from the information provided that housing had the highest percentage of household expenditure at over 70% in 1950, followed by food, education. After 60 years, a reversal could be seen in the proportion of household spending of housing and food, in which the percentage of food rose significantly from 11.2% to 34%, while this figure of housing declined considerably by 50%. Consequently, food was at the top of household expenditure, surpassing housing at the end of the period.
In 60 years, housing's percentage of household expenditure experienced a reduction thus this figure in education, transportation and other experienced a growth but still low. Similarly, health care's percentage of household spending grew slightly from 2.4% to 4.5% and continued at the bottom of the percentage of household spending over the period.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 61
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 67
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Towhat extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, similarly, still, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4367816092 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1925067506 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2116184365 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.142857143 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226933193005 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139290643511 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182816111271 0.0843802449381 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179025446365 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118514390396 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.