Scientists predict that humans will speak the same language in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
The omnipresence of some languages around the globe has resulted in an anticipation that one specific language will be worldwide spoken by all people in the future. Nodoubt, it has undeniable benefits as well as negative effects which will discuss in upcoming paragraphs.
To embark upon, it is true that universal dialect may help to remove language barriers and allowing people to convey their thoughts and ideas as using the same language which would facilitate to others such as international business, transport, tourism industry and import export business. As the advantage of same language which has no barriers in communication, anyone could communicate and cooperate to each other. It removes hesitation to others and make social relations strong.
However, it is a thought of mine that those aforementioned advantages are negligible when compared with the potential consequence. As people around the world speak merely one language, this would be lead to the disappearance of mother language which are integral part of national identities. For instance, if people around the world speak same language then foreign visitors not able to find different from other nations, it would have no longer chance to enjoy historical heritage.
To conclude, no doubt people can reap a great number of benefits regarding communication, to use an universal dialect but drawbacks should not be overlooked. It should concrete some actions to retain the linguistic world.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-05-22 | Harjeet kaur23 | 56 | view |
- From centuries important part of education have remained same such as reading, writing and maths. With the advent of computers, some people think that computer skill be made as a fourth skill to be added to the list.To what extent do you agree? 67
- Scientists predict that humans will speak the same language in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The omnipresence of some languages around the globe has resulted ...
^^
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...tion that one specific language will be world wide spoken by all people in the future. Nod...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...tion that one specific language will be world wide spoken by all people in the future. Nod...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , transport
...to others such as international business,transport, tourism industry and import export bus...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...ple can reap a great number of benefits in regards of communication, to use an universal dial...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...its in regards of communication, to use an universal dialect but drawbacks should...
^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mmunication, to use an universal dialect but drawbacks should not be overlooked. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, then, well, for instance, no doubt, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4025974026 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04652430161 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1434630512 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.8 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143063388435 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531794193732 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466899473902 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843936321084 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575530666328 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.