The graph below shows the percentage change in the number of international students graduating from universities in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006.
The chart provides information regarding a comparison in percentage of overseas graduate students from universities that base on regions in Canada between 2001 and 2006.
Overall, the percentage of international students who graduated in different Canadian provinces in 2006 was considerably higher than those in 2001 although only the percentages in Alberta showed the reverse.
According to the graph, in 2001 there were just about 3-7 percent graduate pupils from abroad per each region in Canada. However, the next five years, the percentage of the overseas pupils were about 3-8 percent high...
- The chart below shows the employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 Summarize the information by choosing and describe the main idea and make comparisons where appropriate 79
- The international tourism has become cheaper and cheaper and more countries are opening their doors to welcome more tourists.Do the advantage of the international tourism out weight its disadvantage? 63
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree and disagree? 55
- Some people believe that technological tools such as body scanner and CCTV have significantly enhanced our safety and security while others feel that they have resulted In a loss of privacy Do the benefits of these items outweigh their disadvantages 85
- Information technology enables many people to do their work outside their workplace e g at home when traveling etc Do the benefits of this mobility outweigh the disadvantages 71
flaws:
'which' is not used properly in the essay. Check out online how to use 'which','that'
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 171 200
No. of Characters: 881 1000
No. of Different Words: 95 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.616 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.152 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.801 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 67 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 52 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.274 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.565 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.856 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.158 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4