In number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railways lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In these days, many urban around the world are confront of the traffic problems that was caused by the growth of the population, especially is congestion on the rush hour. Some people think that we should build the railway systems to solving this issue which made the debated in our community. In my opinion, I personally think that this statement has both advantages and disadvantages if we consider about many aspects.
First of all, we should discuss about the advantages that railway system benefits our community. In the metropolitans around the world , the number of cars is increasing significantly through many years, which caused the problems in these urban, and governments always stay at the stressful state to find the most suitable solutions to mitigate the congestion issue on the roads. Therefore, we can see clearly that the build of railway systems have ability to solve this problems based on their design and technology prospects. Moreover, the speed of fast train often be improved through many recent years, therefore the people can travel to far from away easily that don’t need to take so much their time. In these days, many developing countries as Vietnam or Thailand are taking the national budget to build the new railways in their urban areas, such as Cat Linh – Ha Dong and Ho Chi Minh metro system that we have read about them in magazines. With the development of sciences, the specialists have capacity enough to improve the railway systems based on technology prospects, therefore we can hope strongly that our world will have the fast train that run by the recycle energy replace of fuel as these days.
In the other hand, there are many people those living in surburban and rural areas are confront of the difficulties in their infrastructure will have no the chance to access the modern railway system as the community of metropolitan. Therefore, the government should set the priority task for improving public transport, which include the bus lanes, subway, and even many cities around the world also focus on build the public water traffic systems that we can take the Venice, London or Sydney as the practical examples. Which will be expected to solve the congestion problems of the urban on rush hour, as well as reduce the pollution was caused by the emission of vehicles was run by fuel consumption.
Conclusion, this statement has both the advantages and disadvantages that we need to consider about many aspects before offer the decision to make the challenges of our traffic systems. I hope strongly that the development of AI and recycle fuel are going to the reduce the risks of climate change down to the lowest level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-11 | hardyboywwe | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-24 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-18 | ActiveBoy | 84 | view |
- In a number of countries, some people think it is neccessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.discuss both t 73
- The charts below show the percentage of spending on different areas in the average household in one country in 1910 and 1960 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the number of students studying different subject areas in one adult education collee between 1985 and 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disgree with this statement 56
- bar graph and table 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 48, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'confronted'.
Suggestion: confronted
...e days, many urban around the world are confront of the traffic problems that was caused...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fits our community. In the metropolitans around the world , the number of cars i...
^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... In the metropolitans around the world , the number of cars is increasing signi...
^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...In the metropolitans around the world , the number of cars is increasing signifi...
^^
Line 4, column 469, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...f railway systems have ability to solve this problems based on their design and tech...
^^^^
Line 4, column 931, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Chi Minh metro system that we have read about them in magazines. With the develo...
^^
Line 6, column 88, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'confronted'.
Suggestion: confronted
...living in surburban and rural areas are confront of the difficulties in their infrastruc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 151, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...lties in their infrastructure will have no the chance to access the modern railway...
^^
Line 8, column 260, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ent of AI and recycle fuel are going to the reduce the risks of climate change down to the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 450.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98888888889 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62067373706 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484444444444 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.0 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.6423523452 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.357142857 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1428571429 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122125847606 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469497955011 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365775453566 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743871840516 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345871912937 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.