An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
In my understanding, I think it is very right move to know the brief history of the doctor before the treatment. Patients will be having options which doctor to choose and from which hospital. Patients will be having a variety of options and so he can ultimately can get the best treatment.
As the patient will be knowing about the doctor then he/she would be having a self confidence that the doctor has done enough of the practice and there is a high chances that he will be definitely getting cured. This will already change the patient mindset that doctor is experienced in his ailing problem, that itself do the half of the cure. For example, half of the psychotics diseases are already in the mind of the patience, knowing the doctor he/she referring to is the best in the field of curing that disease, patient is automatically started to better.
Also, its not all about the mindset of patients. It is also about the rating of doctor. Rating is about the past treatment done by the doctor. Earlier satisfied patients will give a better rating, by which doctor can prove his credibility. In addition to that, if the doctor is getting good then he/she is worthy enough to be get treated. Better the rating, better doctor implies better treatment.
However, if we look at the past record of the doctors, there can be some mishappenings with doctors. There can be some cases where the patient was ill enough that he cannot be cured and ultimately doctor didn't able to cure him/her at all. This will definitely going to reflect on the doctor's past record, which abstain the new ailing patient to choose that doctor. In spite of learning the case fully, people rely on surface knowledge and these kind of cases will directly blame the doctor and ruin the rating of doctor, which will ultimately hobble the patients for doctor's future treatment.
Doctor may have learned new things from his experience but the past ratings will keep affecting the rating of doctor, which will hamper the doctor to become a successful one and patients will still avoid getting treated by the doctor.
In addition to that, higher rating doctor will be having a higher fee which I am very sure not everyone can afford. This will affect patients with lower income.
The inference is doctor's record will definitely affect the ailing patients in negative as well as positive way but one should choose whether this record should be disclosed or not to the patients. As the past record can help choosing the best doctor but it can also stain the reputation of a doctor if he/she has done some minor mistake, which will affect patients trust on the doctor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- A nation should require all of its student to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college. 50
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purpose in six areas of the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...best treatment. As the patient will be knowing about the doctor then he/she would be h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'refers'.
Suggestion: refers
...the patience, knowing the doctor he/she referring to is the best in the field of curing t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 7, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...omatically started to better. Also, its not all about the mindset of patients. ...
^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e cannot be cured and ultimately doctor didnt able to cure him/her at all. This will ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
...re him/her at all. This will definitely going to reflect on the doctors past record, ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 440, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...y, people rely on surface knowledge and these kind of cases will directly blame the doctor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will affect patients with lower income. The inference is doctors record will def...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 226, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to choose' or 'choose'.
Suggestion: to choose; choose
...e patients. As the past record can help choosing the best doctor but it can also stain t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, still, then, well, for example, i think, in addition, kind of, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 29.0 12.4196629213 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75652173913 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37512709838 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.419565217391 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5904877837 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.19047619 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9047619048 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271405355243 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108125851166 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603120901697 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168269849457 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495413495249 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.