The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The two maps illustrate the development of an island, which was built a lot of facilities for tourism. Overall, the biggest significant change was in the center of the island where there is a pier, a reception, a restaurant and a plenty of accommodation.
Before the facilities were constructed, the island was surrounded by a variety of trees in the eastern and western part. After the pier was built, which makes this island to become a place for tourist. In the center of the island that there is a reception, which is a place for people buying services. From here, following the vehicle track to the south, which has a big restaurant near the sea. Furthermore, on the western side where were constructed many accommodations around the trees and the beach is now a swimming area.
Most of the accommodations were built in the middle of the island nearby the reception. Besides that, the island's trees remained untouched, which makes this place more natural. A part of the island in the east is undeveloped.
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present 59
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 73
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83908045977 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89921880495 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.150690599 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181711051085 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741093125684 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053649065138 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125255664725 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276098559832 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.