The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.
The line graph compares the figure for visitors to three different museums in London from June to September in 2013. From the general perspective, various trends in the number of visitors could be observed, including a growth in the British Museum and the Science Museum, a reduction in the Natural History Museum.
In June, the British Museum was the highest of the number of visitors, followed by the Natural History Museum and the Science Museum. From June to August, the British Museum's number of visitors witnessed a huge rise from 600 thousand visitors in June to around 750 thousand visitors in July, then this figure declined significantly by roundly 250 thousand visitors. Meanwhile, the figure for visitors in the Science Museum reduced considerably from 400 thousand visitors to 300 thousand visitors. Similarly, the Natural History Museum's number of visitors experienced a remarkable decrease from 550 thousand visitors to under 400 thousand visitors, but after that, this figure was unchanged from July to August.
Between August and September, the British Museum's number of visitors saw a substantial increase, in which the number went up to 650 thousand visitors, it continued at the top of the number of visitors per month to compare with the others. Lastly, at the end of the period, the Science Museum's and the Natural History Museum's number of visitors grew sharply to 450 and 460 thousand visitors respectively.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 61
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 67
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 56
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, similarly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22510822511 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67230387463 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450216450216 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.2265132417 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.875 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315707929581 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18821078298 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105091860461 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258328808901 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814632986283 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.