It is better to do one project first and then begin to do another than to do several projects at the same time.
Now a day, people usually complain about various tasks they have to do at the same time. I absolutely agree with them and think it is better to do projects one by one. I will cogently explicate my stance on this issue in what follows.
First and foremost, the milestone of every project is quality and it is important to fulfill project in the best way. Admittedly, when one person puts her whole concentration on sole subject, she gains relatively better results and higher quality than when concentrates on more duties. That is because adequate time is allocated for finishing each project instead of dividing the same time between numerous jobs. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the topic is my own experience. When I was in college, I had got two exams that scheduled at the same time and I required preparing myself just in one day. I passed both exams in middle score but whether I had one or each scheduled for the separate time, I would be able to get higher mark.
The second factor which advocates my idea is that the amount of time needs for finishing one project is fewer than multi-project. However, people think in the opposite way. When someone has various types of tasks in limited time, she accelerates her speed. The more pace one has is not the meaning she has done the job with fewer mistake. Contrarily, it is very arduous job to watch out failures when the speed goes up and one will need to recheck the job after is finished. Clearly the amount of time needs for checking again and adjusting mistakes is more than doing the job carefully.
Another reason is it is comfortable to do one task at time. In other word, people usually get stress when they come across lots of things to deal with. So in this case, they may get nervous and do their job in pressure and nervousness. Therefore, the outcomes do not be satisfying at least for themselves. Significantly, doing job calmly makes one feel comfortable and results in better product.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons can led us to the logical result that it is better to complete one project instead of several one to gain better outcome in efficient time. All in all, I finally recommend doing one project first and then begin to do another.
- TPO 35 Integrated Writing Task 3
- communal online encyclopedias 66
- Essay topics: TPO 49- Independent writingDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new f 70
- famous and entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. 76
- At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s is more than doing the job carefully. Another reason is it is comfortable to d...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ousness. Therefore, the outcomes do not be satisfying at least for themselves. Significantly,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ect first and then begin to do another.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60945273632 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54258183897 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52736318408 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1019679033 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2272727273 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.485442549584 0.236089414692 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136723738437 0.076458572812 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122919057141 0.0737576698707 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286096518693 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090813856704 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.