Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claims is based.
Art is one of the important resources to understand the culture of a country. The archeologist gain information about historical places on the basis of art of that time. I totally agreed with the statement that government funding of arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people as well as it is also true that the government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. The artists do not have many funds to work on large scale and to get place in market they have to struggle for long time. The government of the country can help the artists by providing platform and glorify their arts. But the government should not interfere in integrity of the arts then only the arts can be flourishing. The issue can understood well with some reasons to support and build its strength.
Firstly, when the government provides funding to any sector then the government enclosed some conditions for their own benefits. In democratic countries the government of ruling party spends a lot in the area which will be beneficial for next elections and make restrictions on the fund. For example, in India the ruling party placed statues of their party’s successful leaders and promotes the artists who support the party and the artist handicapped due to their poverty. The partial attitude of government annihilates the integrity of the arts. The government should take solid steps for art with consideration of the integrity.
Secondly, the government mostly sanctions funding for the modern art or the form of art currently appreciated on international level. The actual heritage of any country is the uniqueness of the arts growing in ruler areas of the country. For example in India there are so many different forms of arts present in different states and each state has their own cultural values. The government of India spent more money only on famous art's forms of dance and paintings which are now demanded on international level but the most important art of every state is cooking and it is still neglected. The government should be unfair and enhance every form of art equally without making differences because each art makes country unique.
Thirdly, the funding form government has equally developed the corruption and political leaders behave avariciously to grab money.so the government should consider that the fund reached to artists and used properly. Moreover, in olden days the people used to say that the art is the gift of god which gains by some lucky persons and they met with god through art. But today everything become the source of earning due to computer and internet for example the Drama has taken place by films and music nights taken place by recorded songs and music systems. It is duty of the government to be unbiased and take care of the arts and also integrity of the arts.
Finally, the government of any country has to be vigilant and consider all pros and corns before funding for arts as well as spends fixed amount for art of the country because it is heritage of the country.
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or m 16
- In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain you 58
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 23
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 50
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare Has this change improved the way people live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ntry. For example in India there are so many different forms of arts present in different stat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...internet for example the Drama has taken place by films and music nights taken pl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, third, thirdly, well, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2553.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88145315488 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64168774862 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443594646272 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 790.2 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3034442161 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.045454545 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7727272727 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460715215605 0.243740707755 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158352642606 0.0831039109588 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128869492556 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284206658608 0.150359130593 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101592350778 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.