If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable.
Is it reasonable to take any mean to achieve a goal if a goal is worthy? In my opinion, it depends on the motivation for only oneself or public interests. If a goal is fit for the benefit of everyone, it is justifiable.
If a goal is to satisfy one own's self-interest, it is not justifiable to take any mean to achieve that goal. Humankind has desires to pursue everything they want, and it is the instinct to make human competing for survival. With this desire, humankind does everything to acquire their goal. However, if one takes any means only to fulfill one's interest, it can damage the benefits of others in society. For example, in Taiwan, politicians often revile their opponents with misleading information to win their campaign. A candidate, So-Chung Din, accuses the mayor of Taipei City of betraying Taiwan with fake news. Although the mission of every candidate is to win an election, it makes an adverse effect on not only the reputation of the mayor of Taipei City but also the political environment in Taiwan. Overall, the total benefits acquired in society are less than the total damage received.
However, it is reasonable to take any means to attain a goal if a goal is to improve the benefits of everyone. Sometimes, it is unavoidable to damage someone to do things that benefit everyone. Nevertheless, if we do not achieve that kind of goal, we cannot make our society better. For instance, in Taiwan, it is hard to construct railways because the residents nearby the route of railways do not want to suffer from the noise made by trains. It is necessary for a government to take any means to construct railways because railways can improve the welfare of everyone even the residents nearby. A new railway can decrease everyone's time on transport and prosper the area where a railway station located. Therefore, the total benefits acquired in society are more than the total damage received.
Besides, it does not mean we cannot do any mean to satisfy our interest. With the limitation of not hurting the rights of others, we must encourage everyone to attain their goals with any means. We cannot live in a prosper society without motives of self-interest. For example, before China reformed its economic structure, their government did not allow their people to gain excess rewards than any other. Everyone had the same size of a cake. Without proper incentives, people in China had no incentive to improve anything, and a society worsened. Compared to China, the United States has laws to ensure fair competition and everyone's right. With the limitation of not surpassing the rules, everyone gets encouraged to do any mean to achieve his or her goal. The whole society of the United States prosper.
In conclusion, it is worthy for a goal of pursuing public interests to take any means to attain. In a proposition of not hurting the rights of any other, it is fit to take any means to achieve a worthy goal for self-interest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 70 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Nowshin Tabassum | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Hitesh2411 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 50
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable. 50
- TPO 21 - Genetically modified trees 73
- A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. At present, the nearest jazz club is over 60 miles away from Monroe; thus, our proposed club, the C Note, would have the local market all to itself. In addition, there is ample evi 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... if one takes any means only to fulfill ones interest, it can damage the benefits of...
^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...goals with any means. We cannot live in a prosper society without motives of self-interes...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 810, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e society of the United States prosper. In conclusion, it is worthy for a goal o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 28.8173652695 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 55.5748502994 139% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2455.0 2260.96107784 109% => OK
No of words: 509.0 441.139720559 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8231827112 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75521486039 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 204.123752495 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436149312377 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 817.2 705.55239521 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 4.96107784431 323% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.22255489022 237% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 19.7664670659 147% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8961541218 57.8364921388 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.6551724138 119.503703932 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5517241379 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.51724137931 5.70786347227 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 8.20758483034 268% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254256833145 0.218282227539 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081609368911 0.0743258471296 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105426351218 0.0701772020484 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184628410905 0.128457276422 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663419905186 0.0628817314937 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.3799401198 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.5979740519 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 98.500998004 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.