It is better to have one true friend than all the acquaintances in the world. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is a commonly held belief that having only one true friend is far more beneficial than knowing everyone in the world. In my opinion, I completely agree with this notion.
Firstly, I would say that a true friend is much more supportive than any other acquaintances. While other people come and go in life, the friend who truly understands his buddy will always be ready to support regardless of any circumstances. Whether he is able to help or not, this person will assist his mate willingly and deliberately whereas other acquaintances tend to be out of reach when needed. For example, despite a large number of people I know, there is only one friend who always gives me support whenever I request. This is why people can only count on his best friend besides his family.
Secondly, the highest level of trust can only be found in a close friend. In this material life, acquaintances which include social friends and colleagues are existed to take advantage of others. These people will remain ‘so-called’ friends as long as the central person maintains his wealthy status, which means that such acquaintances will probably no longer be friends in bad times. In contrast, a real friend does not stay for money as this important individual merely comes for a true friendship. Take my oldest buddy for instance, since the first day I met him 15 years ago, he has never demanded my fundings even though he had some serious monetary issues, still, we have an unbreakable friendship. Therefore, this person completely gains my trust indefinitely.
In conclusion, I assert that having a close friend who is fully reliable is undoubtedly better than socializing with thousands of strangers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-23 | drtruong92 | 84 | view |
- University students should pay all the costs of their studies because university education benefits only individuals but not the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- During a recent plane journey, you sat next to a businessman who owns a chain of restaurants. You talked to him and he suggested you should contact him about a possible job in one of his restaurants. Writie a letter to this businessman. In your letter:• 84
- Some people think that an advertisement on TV is useless and others disagree Discuss both sides and give your opinion 59
- You are staying in rented accommodation. You recently held a party to celebrate your birthday. Several neighbors have complained about the noise to your landlord. Write a letter to your landlord. In your letter:•Apologize for the disturbance•Explain t 73
- Some people think that communication by using computers and phones will have negative effects on young people s writing and reading skills Do you agree or disagree 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...reach when needed. For example, despite a large number of people I know, there is only one friend...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98947368421 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91289361549 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617543859649 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6766027723 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.571428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262445519578 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963613303538 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638578117021 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193429460412 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778001744637 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.