Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is important to read or watch news presented by people with different people than people by similar views.
Nowadays, people read the news from different sources such as Internet, TV, newspaper and so forth. Then, this news may be presented by different people who have diversity of views depending on their characters and educational backgrounds. Therefore, the question whether it is important to read the news presented by different views or same views, has long been a topic of controversy among people and distinct circles. On the one hand, there are people who adhere to the belief that news presented by same views give them more details about the news; on the other hand, others believe that reading news presented by different views has outstanding merits. As far as I am personally concerned, the latter carries further weight since not only does it give more thorough analysis of the news but also does it confirm the validity of the news.
Different views discuss the consequences of news from their own perspective. In fact, some news has profound influence on distinct parts of the society requiring to be analyzed by different experts. As a matter of fact, economist will discuss the possible impact on economy, sociologist will consider how it will endanger or improve life condition or politic will talk about how much it will effect on the foreign policy of the country. For instance, Last year, America impose sanction on my country, as a result of which spread spectrum of experts attempt to investigate how this policy will adversely effect on our society, economy and foreign policy. Furthermore, hearing different views provide us more information regarding the news and makes us a multi-dimension person. Subsequently, people will not gain more information regarding particular topic, unless they should read a plethora of views.
Reading a large number of views also increase the validity of news. In fact, although technological advancements provide us diversity source of information, it may not be reliable as the old version of news. In other word, news presented in internet, TV and all the electronic source are in danger of being attacked by hackers or written by authors who are biased. Therefore, some news may be different from person to person’s views. One way to overcome such problem is reading same news from different views and compare them inferring what is really correct and what is not correct. For instance, I usually read news about my foreign policy of my country from both internal and external sources and assess which one is real. Consequently, provided people want to read validate news, they should read a large number of views.
To wrap it up, reading news from spread spectrum of sources is more advantageous than reading the same views since not does it aid people to become a multi-dimensional person but also does it assist people to realize correctness of news. Then, if I am going to read news, I will read them presented by distinct views.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-24 | Meysam-Khan | 73 | view |
- The government should give priority to improving healthcare than to solving environmental problem. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for government to spend money on building modern housing than on preserving historic or traditional buildings and homes 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way for parents to teach children about responsibility is to have them care for an animal. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...and educational backgrounds. Therefore, the question whether it is important to read the news presen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...olitic will talk about how much it will effect on the foreign policy of the country. F...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...estigate how this policy will adversely effect on our society, economy and foreign pol...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...d read a plethora of views. Reading a large number of views also increase the validity of new...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 807, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...to read validate news, they should read a large number of views. To wrap it up, reading news ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, really, regarding, so, then, therefore, for instance, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2427.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04573804574 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78018940106 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459459459459 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 743.4 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4748565854 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.35 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.05 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269792095815 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10509536402 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778694237037 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202584101806 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787487557388 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.