The bar diagram given below shows the in percentage profit of five companies A,B,C,D and E.Critically evaulate the performance of these companies during this span.
The bar chart reveals that information of representation the proportion profit of five campsnies. There are three years are give in the chart
Moving a quick glance that illustration, in 2005 ,c campany was higher profit in proportion but in 2006 was little bit climbed in the profit. Hence, c campany was highest income in 2005 and 2006 in the chart. Afterthat, b and e campanies was equal income source in 2005 to 2007. It was same income.while was not profit upsurge in years.
On the flip side, a company was started income was very low rathen than improved in next year. Campany income was increase then. Furthenmore, in 2007 a campany was highest money in this campany. Then, d campany was performance was fall down in all years.
To conclusion,c campany was profit in percent in 2005 was upsurge income but in 2007 a campany was very higher income in 40 proportion.
- Do you think card less society is realistic and why? what are the advantages and disadvantages 56
- All over the world, societies are facing a growing problem with obesity. This problem affects both children and adults. What are the reasons for this rise in obesity? How it could be tackled? 56
- Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples. 77
- The table below gives information on interest use in six categories by age group. Describe the information in the table and make comparsions where appropriate. 73
- In some countries it is illegal employers to reject job appications on the basis of age criteria .it a positive or negative development. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive campsnies. There are three years are give in the chart Moving a quick glan...
^^
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... quick glance that illustration, in 2005 ,c campany was higher profit in proportio...
^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... campany was higher profit in proportion but in 2006 was little bit climbed in th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ofit in proportion but in 2006 was little bit climbed in the profit. Hence, c campany...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...climbed in the profit. Hence, c campany was highest income in 2005 and 2006 in the chart. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...then than improved in next year. Campany income was increase then. Furthenmore, i...
^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...se then. Furthenmore, in 2007 a campany was highest money in this campany. Then, d campan...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore, in 2007 a campany was highest money in this campany. Then, d campany was pe...
^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...007 a campany was highest money in this campany. Then, d campany was performance...
^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , c
...fall down in all years. To conclusion,c campany was profit in percent in 2005 w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 729.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76470588235 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70431895728 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542483660131 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.226236557 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.9 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0688675862292 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385078671576 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377135246614 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0544625088845 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285116108275 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.