T P O 53

Essay topics:

T P O 53

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that creating high taxes on cigarette and unhealthy foods have several social benefits. While in the listening the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and believes that each of these arguments can be challenged because they are not necessarily led to a decrease in unhealthy habits.

First of all, in the text, it is clearly mentioned that through increasing taxes on unhealthy foods and cigarettes would be reduced its consumption. However, the professor claims that this policy led to some people use cheaper and low-quality cigarette that contains more harmful substances. In addition, maybe people pay much more money on unhealthy foods and they spend much lower money on healthy foods.

Furthermore, the professor disagrees with this idea that pays more taxes of this kind are financially fair. She says that the taxes paid by those smaller incomes are higher than those from bigger incomes and it is not fair.

Finally, in the text, it is stated that increase taxes have benefit for public welfare. The professor subscribes that in this way government decrease attempts to reducing consuming cigarettes like forbidding smoking in public place for example parks or even in private place because continuing these unhealthy habits is financially beneficial to them.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-16 jeffhjz 3 view
2019-10-22 HHH 3 view
2019-04-11 yassaman 3 view
2018-11-05 sh 3 view
2018-09-13 mehrnazsadr 3 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, may, so, while, for example, in addition, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26388888889 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65590275508 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587962962963 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8709119775 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.