As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
At a first glance, the given statement states that if somebody wants to understand the characteristics of society then the major cities should be studied properly. As it is strongly emphasizing on the cities, I am standing against the statement and strongly belief that proper suggestion should be take place here. The major population from any country lives in small town or villages which is also known as urban area. If a person wants to study characters of society, he should also study small town along with major studies.
In first example, when we considered about developing countries like India, the major population in the country (approximately 65%) of the total population is still residing in villages or say urban area. The major cities of India such as Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata and Bengaluru etc. in which around 11% of total population of India resides. Thus, a clear difference among the population can be observed. It is most important that to know character of society major population of Country or region take into the count. The true culture of society is seen in villages of India where greenery covering the mother earth, crops of different grains can be seen.
Additionally, the rainforest of Amazon in the South America is an another example that supports this concept because many areas are even untouched today. Many tribes living there around thousands of year ago. So the true characters of society of amazon can be observed in their lifestyle, fashion and food-habits.
However, the major cities played an important role in the economic development and social development of country. So it is one of the major factors to survey the major cities as it summarizes the entire country. The distribution of population per unit area is more compare to other major cities.
Hence, it is true that every coin as 2 sides. In this way sum of all we conclude that the major cities played an important role but to understand a society one must take surveyed all the other areas of country or region because still villages are life-line of many countries.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Young people enjoy life more than older people do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov 37
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 50
- "A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer." 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'an example' or 'another example'.
Suggestion: an example; another example
...orest of Amazon in the South America is an another example that supports this concept because many...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, still, then, thus, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94842406877 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6763067299 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512893982808 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.470030833 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9444444444 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0324652369945 0.243740707755 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0129499761533 0.0831039109588 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0214399983074 0.0758088955206 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0171190587909 0.150359130593 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171817588355 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.