The table shows the change in the percentage of people joining in seven different sports from 1999 to 2009.
The table illustrates the variation in the proportion of people attending in seven kinds of sports in the Europe between 1999 to 2009.
Overall, It is viewed that, football always received the highest percentage of people than rest of others. Whereas, golf had a small number of people in 1999.
To begin, about 57% of people joined in football in 1999, which was decreased steadily in other recorded years but always occupied the highest proportion. Whereas, the number of people joined tennis was 32% less than in football in 1999 but there was a slight increase and reached to 33% in 2009. About 32% people swam in 1999, it just increased slightly to 34% and flattened out after 2004.
As can be seen, there is a mere minority of golf and volleyball; however, they jumped further 17% and 185 respectively in 2009. Basketball accounted for 26% in 1999 and it experienced a decrease of 2% in 2009. By contrast, Yoga had only 10% of people in the first five years and raised to 13% in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-16 | binita karki | 84 | view |
- Some people say that we are wasting our money in the space race. We need to spend money on earth. Do you agree or disagree with this. 61
- Some people think that government should invest in arts and cultural events. Others think that government should invest money on more important things. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 67
- The gap between the rich and the poor people is increasingly widespread, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address the problem. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rcentage of people than rest of others. Whereas, golf had a small number of people in 1...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... than rest of others. Whereas, golf had a small number of people in 1999. To begin, about 57% ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68181818182 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51102938952 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0976161208 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5555555556 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311706734687 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126652334045 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742275524683 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19326507555 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743478227715 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.