Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In response to the given statement I agree with the notion that governements should not fund researches with unclear consequences on account of following reasons that this futile process may result in wastage of money and manforce but also may hinder the tentative scientific progress and expose the community to unnecessary side effects.
The evolution of the mankind can greatly be attrubuted to the scientific progress the need of which has even more inceased given the increased and more complex nature of menances that our world faces today. In addition the sources of a governemnt to invest are not only a prestigious responsibility but also scarce enough necessasitating the best use of them in the develoment of the country and mankind as a whole.
The scientific research process consumes a lot of fninacial assets to be carried out and if the finance is invested in a futile process it would result in a loss of money which would otherwise be well spent in useful reaserach and betterment of the humanity.
Research does consume a great many scientific minds who have given their lives to the study and develoment of science and it is extremely important that their energy and time should be used in best interest of the nation. Creating a single scientist also puts a great burden on the finance of the country so wasting their efforts would also cause financial loss to the government.
Science is a platform of practicality and experimentation. It is based on probability and chances rather than miracles and intuition. In addition there is too much yet to be discovered today and we are in dire need of treatments to the epidemics, global warming, education and many other acute problems. If the time, energy and money is spent in blind alleys, it would cause a hindrance to the natural course of progression of science.
Most of the scientific experiments do not leave the environemnt the same as it was before and their adverse results can shape the ugly future for the humanity. One of the most important examples of this is the experiment with nuclear fusion and atom bombs. Each experiment not only destroyes a huge area of earth but also emits unending ionizing radiations that keep haunting the humans living around for generations ranging from gentic mutations to global warming.
A contrary argument might suggest that since a lot of past experiments whose results were unclear at the moment resulted in some of the greatest discoveries of science and that the scientific process is an unclear and experimental process so it should be let to take its course.
In conclusion given the fact that resources of a government are scarce in terms of finance, scientific workforce and time and that it results in unnecesary changes to the environment which mostly are adverse, hence the argument that governments should not fund the scientific research whose consequences are unclear holds good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Vaibhav Panchal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | sayali7 | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | 08sandip | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...menances that our world faces today. In addition the sources of a governemnt to invest a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
...at their energy and time should be used in best interest of the nation. Creating a sing...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... rather than miracles and intuition. In addition there is too much yet to be discovered ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, well, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2432.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 486.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00411522634 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84138424204 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.8240388476 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.133333333 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4 23.4991977007 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175405693377 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505051716586 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646217000225 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853228822654 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070953076935 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.