Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single.
some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is irrefutable that nowadays interviewers are seeking for personal information and marital status to choose candidates whether they are suitable for their works. Some counter arguments by section of people who don't believe to ask personal information or interest and this is irrelevant to the interview. I am of the opinion that this mater should be debated before any conclusion can be drawn.
On the other hand, there are some logical behind to ask about their own information or ambitions or hobbies to job seekers in order to selection criteria. Firstly, manager or higher official has to know to select the candidate can able to suitable for their jobs, if any family commitments or if they have an own interest to start any business in that scenario who can not be selected for longer term projects work. Secondly, female candidates who is single they can work for longer term work until they get marry after then they will plan to go for pertinacity leave so this is manager or Human Resource team responsibilities to identify the person accordingly. For Instance, in India, there are minimum 15% people who generally in pertinacity leave and temporary people who handle their work.
On the one hand, general information are not really important to interview criteria in order to choose the right person. Most important scenario that we need to identify the person who is having more analytical skill and problem solving method that we have to identify it. Secondly, how they strong in their categories of work and how much they involved about their existing process these are questions will give a good candidate to the team. Finally, work adaptability, mingle with the team and motivation are the best skills to choose the right candidates.
To sum up this, employer can identify the candidate based on their own information about themselves or marital status will provide a good candidate to the team. However, Employer has to identity the candidate based on his past working experience and not with their extra activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | jeetender | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | PALAK AHUJA | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | MihirGosai | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Harrynguyen1980 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | namodi17 | 73 | view |
- Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic: The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and 78
- Write a letter to your friend about a book that you have read recently Include the following in your letter Describe the book Why do you want him her to read it Tell him her how to get the book 93
- Write about the following topic. Recently, abortion increases rapidly and becomes a controversial topic. Some people suppose that abortion should be legal while others are against it.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your 61
- Write a letter to a friend telling him/her that you’re going back to your hometown and you want to give him/her some furniture. Please say – Why you thought about him/her – Describe the furniture – Suggest a way for him/her to get it 56
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nter arguments by section of people who dont believe to ask personal information or ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'behinds'?
Suggestion: behinds
... the other hand, there are some logical behind to ask about their own information or a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, as to, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03539823009 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70910188778 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516224188791 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0116440316 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.307692308 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0769230769 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253467715349 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956046374355 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592870650031 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159052378434 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855999213738 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.