Government should spend more money on environment protection than on economic.
Currently, society has witnessed an unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, while the environment is continuously deteriorated, which even poses a threat to we human beings’ survival and triggers a heated discussion about which should be regarded as the government’s first priority, environmental protection or the economy. Opinions vary widely, some citizens reckon that the economy, as our solid foundation of living qualities, deserves more attention from the authority, while some other individuals harbor the idea that without environmental protection, the economy, as an architect based on environment, cannot thrive on its highway. Personally speaking, I concur with the latter opinion for reasons as follows.
To start with, in terms of individuals, nowadays people’s living conditions have been significantly elevated compared to the past. However, the problem confronted with city dwellers is that they are prone to suffer from the deteriorated environment. While it is the careless advancement of the economy results in environmental deterioration. For instance, a bunch of children have a cough or pneumonia owing to the intensified haze generated by the proliferation of private cars in the metropolis, some elder citizen may also be plagued with varieties of chronic diseases caused by environmental contamination produced by the excessive construction in urban areas. All of these listed health problems result in pain. Although the authority is capable of distributing funds to further develop the economy so as to find out more efficient approaches to cure diseases, the pain exerted on human beings is irreversible, hence, the expenditure on developing economic is supposed to allocate to protect the environment, which can address the health issue from its root and relieve citizens from pain.
What’s more, with regard to the national development, during the process of globalization, each country spares no effort to build up its all-round strengths, especially the economic strengths. Some of these countries overexploit its natural resource, while others introduce industries that are likely to provoke irreversible environment contamination. Under the circumstance, they have achieved progress in the globalization, however, the development is not sustainable due to its detrimental effects on global ecology. To be more specific, the overexploitation will eventually leads to the dearth of energy to sustain the basic necessities of we human beings, meanwhile, the industries introduced to local region to enhance its economy will give rise to contamination, which not only makes city dwellers there have fatal diseases but also deteriorates local surrounding to impede it from further advancement. Therefore, it is impossible for a country to develop the economy without sufficient support from the environment.
Admittedly, developing the economy is of crucial significance, since with the improved economic situation, we are rendered with multiple choices, including basic necessities, jobs, entertainment facilities and so on. Nevertheless, with sufficient funds utilized to protect the environment, not only us but also our future generation are capable of enjoying the benefits led by the advancement of the economy, therefore the perks of developing the economy seem lackluster compared to the continuous benefits from allocation toward environmental protection.
In a nutshell, an eligible authority is supposed to allocate sufficient funds to protect the environment, which constitutes a stepping stone in the further development of the economy, therefore benefiting not only us but also our offspring.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
- If a city has given the money to investment, which options do you prefer listed in the following 3
- What is the most useful way to help the natural environment?Plant more trees and build parksStores stop providing plastic bagsIncrease access to public transportation to reduce the number of cars on the road 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement:It it better to spend money on travelling and vacation than save money for the future. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Physical exercise is more important to older people than to younger people 80
- When you are deciding which of the two places to visit, should you discuss with someone who has visited the two places or read online and why? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ffer from the deteriorated environment. While it is the careless advancement of the e...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 809, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ng funds to further develop the economy so as to find out more efficient approaches to c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...c, the overexploitation will eventually leads to the dearth of energy to sustain the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... to the dearth of energy to sustain the basic necessities of we human beings, meanwhile, the indu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ndered with multiple choices, including basic necessities, jobs, entertainment facilities and so ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, to start with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 88.0 52.1666666667 169% => OK
Nominalization: 39.0 8.0752688172 483% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3134.0 1977.66487455 158% => OK
No of words: 537.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83612662942 4.8611393121 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40030615032 2.67179642975 127% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 212.727598566 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545623836127 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 1016.1 618.680645161 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.51630824373 125% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.359158764 48.9658058833 223% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 184.352941176 100.406767564 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5882352941 20.6045352989 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0756542249572 0.236089414692 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.021717497678 0.076458572812 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030648910204 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0450904886629 0.150856017488 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271822121969 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.9 11.7677419355 186% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 14.63 58.1214874552 25% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.10430107527 260% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 10.1575268817 186% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 10.9000537634 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.01818996416 132% => OK
difficult_words: 183.0 86.8835125448 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 10.002688172 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.247311828 215% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.