Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately.
Right from childhood we are put in a box interpreted as good, bad, right and wrong. While some people concur with the statement that the mischievous students should be grouped and taught separately, others including me have a different opinion. I will provide evidence and justification in this essay to validate my view.
Foremost, bringing all the naughty pupils in the same batch is absolutely an bad idea as it is similar to putting all the rotten mangoes together. A child is a product of the influence around himself. Putting all the disobedient children together may help the rest if the obedient class. However, would be detrimental to the noisy group itself as it diminishes all the possibilities of improving their behavior. For example, if a student misbehaves with the teacher on regular basis he can influence others. Grouping this set would have higher possibility of aggravating their temper and affecting them psychologically and academically.
Secondly, in order to teach this rackety lot the educational institute would require to appoint a much strict staff who would not only discipline them, but also, the students would be eager to learn from them. However, this would add to an additional cost of infrastructure and resources for the alma matter.
Having manifested the above aforementioned points I would like to conclude that even if a child is mischievous he might be brilliant academically. Instead of grouping the children they should be shown a proper direction. A commissioner having the right knowledge and experience with children would be the right option for schoolds in order to provide the consultation and right guidance to these kids and their parents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-22 | minhhh123 | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-27 | shadow1222 | 61 | view |
| 2021-05-07 | c0758910@mylambton.ca | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | basakgok9 | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-25 | Neh86 | 60 | view |
- Cities are becoming overcrowded What are the causes of this situation and what can be done to improve this situation Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 92
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... pupils in the same batch is absolutely an bad idea as it is similar to putting al...
^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'put', 'putt'?
Suggestion: put; putt
...olutely an bad idea as it is similar to putting all the rotten mangoes together. A chil...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding influence'?
Suggestion: the surrounding influence
...ngoes together. A child is a product of the influence around himself. Putting all the disobedient children t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'appointing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: appointing
...the educational institute would require to appoint a much strict staff who would not only ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20437956204 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00907041601 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605839416058 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7441866497 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.857142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244036857249 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760663574375 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729823030273 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134513904 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460956180806 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.