It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves
The speaker claimed that we are characterized by our social groups. I completely agree with the above statement. Forming groups and coterie are an innate characteristic of human behavior.
Children mix with other children who have same interest. There are students who are very good in studies always remain with the peers who are top in class while student who do not want to study much and waste their precious time stay together. Similarly, most of the groups made are on the basis of certain likes and dislikes which are common among the group members. So, we as human start forming groups from very beginning. Then, people associate themselves with different clubs like sport, drama, singing and other, tend to stay with each other because they have common interest.
Furthermore, people mostly work in the areas in which they are interested in and so they opt different occupations. People who have interest in sports become sportsman, people who have interest in science and exploring things, become scientists and so on. Even the great revolutions of the world took place due to the formation of social groups. In the USA, slavery was wide spread in early days. People who had compassion about the pain and suffering of the people under slavery began to make groups and created resistance against slavery. Similarly, in the past, women were subjugated in countless areas of life such as they did not have the right to vote. It was the formation of social groups by the people who had high values that everyone in the society should be treated equally formed social groups and propagated their ideas which resulted in the equality in the society.
Political parties are good example of social groups. These groups have members who have same ideology to take the society under their governance in that direction. There are parties who have the agenda to provide people with fast growing economy and employment while other have the goal to improve foreign relations and save environment. Even, the supporters of these parties with different ideologies form social groups.
So, it is the inert nature of human to form group on the basis of their common interest. The social group by which a man is associated reveals his true identity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-27 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | zanzendegi | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | tomlee0205 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Jeyodi | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
- The following is taken from the editorial section of the local newspaper in Rockingham."In order to save a considerable amount of money, Rockingham's century-old town hall shouldbe torn down and replaced by the larger and more energy-efficient b 62
- In order to reduce costs, we should close some of our existing small assembly plants and build a large central plant. Grandview would be an ideal location for this new plant. First, of the locations that we have considered, Grandview has the largest adult 90
- "Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce theirintake of foods containing fats and cholesterol, and today low-fat products abound in manyfood stores. Since many of the food products currently marketed by Old 66
- Many museums charge admission fees while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- "Anyone can make things bigger and more complex. What requires real effort and courage is to move in the opposite direction-in other words, to make things as simple as possible." 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'interested'.
Suggestion: interested
...n mix with other children who have same interest. There are students who are very good i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, similarly, so, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98936170213 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45216804324 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521276595745 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4095809561 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9047619048 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.47619047619 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18034116343 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065116805127 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528059309917 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127811550173 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049600554332 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.