We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is a popular belief that we cannot support everyone in need on earth so it is reasonable that we should only concentrate on our own groups and nations. In my opinion, this statement is partly agreeable.
Personally, I totally agree with the fact that people always need supports. In the history of humanity, poverty, diseases, and war are constantly challenging people to breakthrough their hardship. Even in today society, when both natural and social sciences have greatly developed, some part of the world still suffer from the same problems that we had to faced decades ago. So it is only ignorance to think that we can solve every problem existing just because people need our helps. Even the ethical code of conduct for social workers admits that limited resources is an unchangeable feature when working with people in need.
Despite the harsh truth about the ever existing problems in the world, I can hardly agree with the idea of own groups and nations concentrated belief. In a global economy, every country is heavily depended on the others to develop further. The surplus of a developing nation means that more goods and services are being provided globally and thus create more jobs and opportunities for others countries. In addition to economic benefits, safety also is a significant aspect when considering offering support for certain communities and nations. A harmless virus when traveled through a community with over usage of antibiotics may evolve into a great threat to humanity. A nation in continuous internal conflict will lead to others nations immigrant problems. With reasonable concerns about others communites and nations, ones can be benefited greatly not only from increased reputation in external relationship but also from living in a safer world that they have created.
In conclusion, I have to admit that we cannot help everyone in need but it is irrational to only concentrate on our own groups and nations.
- the diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 73
- Compare 2 table about information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in 5 European countries 61
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Line graph: https://imgur.com/a/Eh2mMhu 73
- two tables about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in five European countries in 1994 and 2004 67
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 23, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...artly agreeable. Personally, I totally agree with the fact that people always need supports. In the his...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.121875 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72832187148 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9446238501 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.266666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32286709883 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959550571678 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920111569855 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222944716761 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801262856574 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.