The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
The chart provides an overview of the types of consumer goods that people spent money on in France and the UK in 2010 measured in pounds sterling.
Overall, it is clear to see that people in the UK spent more on cars, books, and cameras, while people in France spend more on computers and perfume.
The biggest category in both countries was cars. People in the UK spent just over 450000 on this category, while in France spending was a little lower at around 400000. The second highest category in the UK was books, with spending of slightly over 400000. However, in France, buying books was less common and it was the third-most popular category as people only spent around 300000 on them. Computers were the second-most popular consumer product in France with spending of about 380000, while in the UK, computers were fourth on the spending list at 350000.
The biggest difference in spending was related to cameras. Whereas the UK spent just over 350000 on cameras, people in France spent less than half this amount at round 150000. Finally, the French spent about 200000 on perfume, which was noticeably higher than the UK’s figure of about 145000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | kheth | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | phungnguyen1611 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | truongquangwt | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Mattia95 | 61 | view |
- The charts above show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report of at least 150 words describing the information shown. 84
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewable in the year 2009 87
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 11
- The graphs below show the average monthly expenditure on children's sport and participation in different sports in the UK from 2008 to 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86934673367 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28249149618 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497487437186 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1408131306 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0575815965096 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311693417707 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062058237272 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0584534442708 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849121501769 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.