Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (e.g: environment, cost). Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Determining the most urgent priority for government spending has been high on agenda for decades. While many people appreciate other issues like environment or cost, I believe that the authority should channel its budget into improving public transportation.
On the one hand, the importance of many priorities is considered to dominate that of state-run transport system because of several reasons. Firstly, although faster public means of transport is beneficial, surveys in many countries show that they bring about an inadequate outcome. For example, it was reported that despite a 10-percent in speed of light rail transport, its utilization did not obtain a proportional increase in New York, making the state’s project an unwise decision. By contrast, a spending for tackling other heated challenges like environmental degradation, or soaring crime rate can contribute to a comprehensive improvement, which is taken advantage by people around the country rather than in a narrow region. As an organ responsible for assuring social equality, it will be acceptable if the government prioritizes its expenditure on these issues.
On the other hand, I concur with the view that funding should be provided to upgrade public transport systems. From an economical perspective, there has been a consensus that faster vehicles can decrease journey time. Hence, citizens and firms can shorten their commuting and delivery duration, leading to a higher profit because of a lower overhead cost. In addition, allocating resources to public transport infrastructure, the authority is thought to adopt a multi-purpose policy, which resolves an excessive load of problems. Indeed, upgraded state-run vehicles are expected to discourage uses of private ones and, therefore, ease traffic flow. Not only does this help prevent traffic congestion but also reduces contamination of harmful gases, the major cause of air pollution.
Briefly, while not disavowing impacts of other issues, it seems to me that a faster public transportation should be prioritized by states.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-28 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
- Space travel has been made sometime and people think that space tourism will be probably developed in the future. Do you think space travel would be a positive and negative development? 89
- Nowadays, sport is becoming a big business with high earning for professional sportsmen and a lot of companies have involved in financially and in other ways.Is this a positive or negative development? 84
- The table below shows the number of cars produced in 3 countries between 2003 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is encouraged Is this trend is a positive or negative development 93
- the only way to improve safety of out roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses.To what extent do you agree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tation should be prioritized by states.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62300319489 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0898846967 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664536741214 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1908595133 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.714285714 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202889150053 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662777062157 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626549610178 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137445930454 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03500620292 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.