Some people believe that it is a good to share as much information as possible in scentific research, bussiness and the academic world. Other believe thar some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Almost any day of the week you can look at a newspaper and read articles discussing about sharing all the information in a public with free access. Is iT right or not?
On the one hand, it would be wonderful due to people can be more educated and would not be narrow-minded. For instance, if all information is free, people will study yourself and take matter seriously at their developing. Moreover, people can safe their money, which they are planning to invest to any educational purposes. Also, sharing useful information in business literature, scrutiny and in all the academic world is a good opportunity, I think. So, I understand people, who believe that it is good.
An alternative point is based on the advantages of keeping important and valuable data safety. First of all, the information can be dangerous. For example, if every can know how build a atomic bomb, someone can will destroy something, so, from me point of view, it makes sense definitely. Secondly, some people can earn money sharing the important information to others, so they will be redundant, if they ir services are not relevant. Based on this point. we have a new problem, which connected with unemployment.
In any case, an attitude to this issue always depends on a particular persons character and his or her personal circumstances or backgrounds. But as for me, I have not made a decision yet, hence i Understand both of views and all of them i truly concern logically. so, at this currently moment I agree with both statements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | raja2577 | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | aigerimka_12 | 61 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 56
- The maps below show the cente of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for it is development.Summarise the information by selectind and reporting yhe main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people believe that it is a good to share as much information as possible in scentific research, bussiness and the academic world. Other believe thar some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and g 61
- People living in the 21st century are enjoying better quality of life compared to people who lived in the previous centuries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...or example, if every can know how build a atomic bomb, someone can will destroy s...
^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... are not relevant. Based on this point. we have a new problem, which connected wit...
^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...is issue always depends on a particular persons character and his or her personal circu...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
..., I have not made a decision yet, hence i Understand both of views and all of the...
^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... all of them i truly concern logically. so, at this currently moment I agree with ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, as for, for example, for instance, i think, first of all, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87307692308 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91448890239 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6319389181 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1875 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215340937889 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634192305233 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611328108335 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117686318246 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572918679254 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.